This paper will discuss the prescription drug abuse in the youth. Three articles written by several authors will be compared and contrasted on the methodologies used by to conduct their research on how racial/ethnic backgrounds, motivations, and education influence substance abuse. All have a correlation on highlighting the misuse of prescription drug use by young adults. Each article gives its own interpretation of study on how and why youth are misusing prescription drugs on an ethical level, how this problem is very understudied, the risks of misusing prescription drugs, treatments for youth affected by this growing problem and preventative measures.
In the three articles of study, the writers needed to inspect youth and the abuse of prescribed drugs. Despite the fact that the articles center around youth and prescription drugs, diverse research techniques were utilized to test their theorizes. In comparison, two articles written by Kelly, Rendina, Vuolo, Wells and Parsons (2014) and Kim, Chen, Levin, Keyes, Cerda’ and Storr (2015) used a qualitative approach to conduct their study. The studies were conducted with a large sampling group ranging from 400 to 36, 781 participants which had a longitudinal study over a time period.
Results from both articles did seem to support the hypothesis even though both studies showed limitation within. On contrast, article written by Conn and Marks (2014) used the quantitative empirical approach to collect data to describe ethnic/racial group differences in prescription drug misuse within a nationally representative sample of US adolescents. Also to identify potential sociocultural influences on this health risk behavior. From the techniques utilized, gave new ethnic gathering particular data about the job that the dispositions of companions and guardians on substance utilize may play in whether young people abuse prescription drugs. To be better test the theory, a longitudinal report would have been best to test the speculation.
Each article of study had to show their study to be reliable. Conns and Marks (2014) and Kim, Chen, Levin, Keyes, Cerda’ and Storr (2015) data was reliable. Conns and Marks (2014) Conns and Marks (2014) article leads a reliability (test-retest reliability). Constraint in the examination made the test be inconsistent. The investigation utilized a current and national database which constrained the utilization of factors that could be utilized to analyze for members reaction decision.
Closed-ended reactions restrained the capacity to survey subtleties of such messages about prescription drug abuse. What’s more, the things did not evaluate for peer associates or parental approval of prescription drug abuse; in this way, it is suggested that future investigations attempt to quantify the full range of states of mind with respect to prescription drug abuse. Second, while the utilization of a national informational collection builds generalizability, the outcomes can’t be summed up to all youths, especially those in other ethnic or racial gatherings excluded in this examination.
What’s more, the present examination did exclude young people who self-recognized as multiracial, a portion of the populace that is quickly expanding in the United States.
We will send an essay sample to you in 2 Hours. If you need help faster you can always use our custom writing service.Get help with my paper