In the eyes of many, there are no better examples of two people standing on the opposite side of a spectrum of any sort than Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X are both very important , most historical figures in the history of America, and the most iconic idols of the African American heritage. Being that these two had many different beliefs and different tactics in to spread across their message they both tried their best. Their works Letter from a Birmingham Jail and Ballot or the Bullet are both ways they tried to spread their message and how they used different strategies to do so. Both King and X use tone, philosophy, and ethos, logos, pathos to reach their goal.
Martin Luther King Jr’s Letter from Birmingham Jail and Malcolm X’s The Ballot or the Bullet are two very persuasive speeches just in their different ways. X is very blunt when speaking while King speaks very patiently and peacefully. Malcolm X gets straight to the point and just comes out and says blacks deserve rights and we will get them by any means. I’m nonviolent with those who are nonviolent with me. But when you drop that violence on me, then you’ve made me go insane. This is a radical approach. King, on the other hand takes a rational approach by pushing nonviolent protest and direct action. Malcolm X uses logos, ethos, and pathos in a more persuasive way The Ballot or the Bullet than King does in Letter from Birmingham Jail because he is more assertive with his tone and will do anything to meet his goals.
King and X both use ethos pathos, and logos to showcase their beliefs, civil rights movement, and their approaches. King starts by building his credibility by addresses the clergymen as friends by saying , Fellow Clergymen I feel that you are men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth sending the message showed that he is no less than them and they are no better than him. Martin Luther King then proceeds to justify his cause for protest and establishes reasons for the advancement of civil rights, logos .Specifically, he does so by raising doubts about the meaning of a just law and pointing out specific examples in which laws were unfair and unjust. King says,We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was ‘legal’ and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was ‘illegal.’ It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany. Even so, I am sure that, had I lived in Germany at the time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers. He then uses many allusions to multiple philosophers, and also religious leaders to get to the human emotions. in order to appeal to the human emotions King describes his disappointment in the church,
We will send an essay sample to you in 2 Hours. If you need help faster you can always use our custom writing service.Get help with my paper