logo
user
  • Sign in
  • Sign up

Han and Roman Attitude Towards Technology

1 Pages

Downloads

Words: 345

Date added: 18-12-30


rated 4.6/5 based on 13 customer reviews.

Type:

Level: high-school

Category:

open document save to my library

The world operations have been made easier with significant development in technology. The advent of technology dates to the periods of stone-age tools. Man, during the stone age era applied the use of simple tools in undertaking different activities. However, with the advancement in time and inventions, these simple machines have been turned into more sophisticated items that have made work more manageable Achterhuis (2001). Do all humans have the same attitude towards technology? Are there conflicting ideas and perspectives held on technology? As a response to this, the paper will evaluate and assess the attitudes that Han and Roman have on technology.

Han in the documents holds a favourable view towards technology and holds reverence towards it. On the other hand, the perspective of Roman towards the same is contradictory. As such, the two parties present to us a parallel and conflicting ideas towards technology. Han appreciates the fact that technology has boosted human life. For instance, he outlines the steps in ensuring water preservation which makes good use technology. Han further, clarifies on how technology was applied to improve the efficiency of pestle and mortar. Gonzalez (2015) attests to this mentality on how water hydraulics can be implemented in managing floods and conserving water.

Roman holds a cynical and deplorable perspective with regards to technology. Firstly, Senecca argues that tools were never invented by wise men. His premise creates an argument of what qualifies a wise man? Achterhuis (2001) maintains that the ability of an individual to develop and discover something makes the person wise. Therefore, it is null and void for the Roman to reach such a conclusion.

In conclusion, individuals have the right to an opinion, and this has been practiced by both Han and Roman. However, the truth value of the views can only be evaluated with the evidence produced. In which case Han's views are more convincing as compared to Roman's.

References

Achterhuis, H. (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Bloomington [u.a.: Indiana University Press.

Gonzalez, W. J. (2015). New perspectives on technology, values, and ethics: Theoretical and practical. Cham : Springer

Read full document← View the full, formatted essay now!
Is it not the essay you were looking for?Get a custom essay exampleAny topic, any type available
banner
x
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we'll assume you're on board with our cookie policy. That's Fine