logo
user
  • Sign in
  • Sign up

Gun Violence in American Culture

6 Pages

Downloads

Words: 1703

Date added: 19-03-20


rated 4.6/5 based on 17 customer reviews.

Level: high-school

Category:

open document save to my library

Guns, guns, and more guns are becoming an integral part of American culture. The problem is that guns are providing far too many Americans with the courage to be insane or even misuse them. Guns have their pros and cons. Guns can be used to protect citizens in their everyday life or those same guns can be used to harm those citizens. Despite having gun law, we still face common tragedies to this day such as mass shootings, school shootings and even suicide. So, what can really change to prevent such things from happening or can the common problem be changed at all?

According to the United States law the laws regulate the manufacture, trade, possession, transfer, record keeping, transport, and destruction of firearms, ammunition, and firearms accessories. We should allow the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to track gun sales, and keep the data it collects electronically and searchable. This data would be a slight decrease in violence if we knew more about the firearm that's been sold or even the area of location. Most individuals still manage to get possession on firearms and ammunition but is that enough. We need to empower a permanent commission, possibly under the Department of Homeland Security, to bring all the data together, in consultation with law enforcement, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education and any other relevant parties, to make ongoing policy and regulatory recommendations to reduce gun violence.

Firearm sales and individual verification records are basic devices law implementation can use to understand wrongdoings including firearms and recognize degenerate weapon merchants and buyers. While government law requires authorized firearm merchants to keep up deals records, it likewise requires the FBI to annihilate affirmed historical verification records, hampering law authorization endeavors. States can and should find a way to fill the holes in government law. Firearm sales and personal investigation records can be utilized by law authorization in various approaches to explain weapon wrongdoings and recognize firearm merchants and buyers who are disregarding state and government firearm laws. For instance, deals records can empower officers to distinguish the last retail buyer of a gun that has been utilized in a wrongdoing, which can prompt the ID and indictment of fierce offenders.

Federal law requires authorized guns merchants to keep up records of weapon deals inconclusively, including data about the firearms being acquired, and the purchaser. Federal law disallows the government from gathering gun deals records in a focal storehouse, in any case. Without a focal archive of all gun deals records, weapon following is a moderate, unwieldy process. Unified records of weapon possession would significantly expand the proficiency of the following procedure. These records would likewise help law requirement recover guns from people who have turned out to be lawfully denied from having them, and they could be utilized to alarm law implementation to the nearness of weapons at a private living arrangement when they are reacting to a crisis call.

All together for law authorization to have finish data about weapon possession, notwithstanding, Congress would need to bring the private deal to a loophole, which enables weapons to be sold by people who are not authorized guns merchants.

Governmentally authorized gun merchants are required to utilize the National Criminal Instant Background Check System (NICS) to direct individual verifications on forthcoming guns buyers to guarantee that the gun exchange would not abuse administrative or state law. For instance, merchants may endeavor to conceal deals to individuals who might fail a background check by putting the name of somebody with a spotless record on the background check application. Another manner by which law requirement could utilize individual verification records is to reveal weapon trafficking rings. To recognize weapon traffickers, government law expects merchants to report offers of more than two guns in a five-day time frame to ATF. People can just avoid this prerequisite by purchasing firearms from various merchants. Without an incorporated archive of records, merchants have no chance to get of realizing that purchasers are visiting various merchants.

When getting a firearm if you are a felon with a sentence exceeding 2 years or a misdemeanor, past or present and those who are involuntarily admitted in a mental institution are disqualified for getting a firearm. I feel as is if you have a felony or a misdemeanor period you should not qualify for a firearm. If we have anyone trying to get a license I feel we can eliminate a lot of problems by having these individuals obtaining a psych evaluation to determine whether you are suitable or not to have a firearm. If you a felony, why cannot more investigation be done to these individuals or safer use on firearms.

We live in a society that involves incredible decent variety of practices and philosophies. We are likewise a society that tries to oblige however many of these practices and belief systems as could be allowed. Be that as it may, as a society, do we not have the privilege to guarantee the wellbeing of our citizens? Do we not have the obligation to ensure our kids as they play and learn in their schools? Do we not have the privilege to appreciate a motion picture without dread of being executed or injured? Is the second amendment more prominent in degree and significance than the other constitutional amendments? Given the present condition, clearly it is. Should we keep on giving more noteworthy assurance to weapon proprietors to the detriment of the rest of society, we can rely on more mass killings and suffering. I trust that we should never again endure seeing individuals grieve the loss of family and companions essentially claiming others have a need to arm themselves with weapons that are intended to murder.

Mass homicides are not dedicated by rational individuals. Just a little portion of rationally sick individuals at any point end up brutal, and afterward, ordinarily, when they neglect to get treatment. People with a serious dysfunctional behavior ought not be permitted to buy weapons or approach them. Join firearms and untreated psychological instability, you have a disaster holding up to occur. When your child turns 18, he or she has a common ideal to reject treatment and remain rationally sick until or except if she or he ends up self-destructive or desperate, as controlled by judges at responsibility hearings. State laws shift, yet all states set strict controls with respect to automatic hospitalization and constrained treatment, restricting it to conditions when a man is an inescapable risk to self or others, or prone to end up so. These laws give adults with psychological sickness the privilege to choose when, where, how and regardless of whether they will get treatment. However, some genuine psychological instabilities make it troublesome for those influenced to evaluate their own requirement for treatment. At the point when persistent rights surpass important securities, people with extreme psychological sickness can pass on. What's more, many do. Also, occasionally, they hurt others along the way. It is hard to evaluate the likelihood of a person to submit a rough demonstration that hurts anybody including himself/herself. In this manner, firearm laws require be observed intently and made more steady all through each state to avoid savagery that could avert mass shootings.

Mass shootings in the United States have been lamentably turned into an irritating pattern that seems to be on the rise. There have been shootings out in the open spots accepting media inclusion and giving the recognition they are turning into the new typical. Schools, malls, movie theaters and even churches, are just a few of territories that have seen weapon savagery from a mass shooter. There are such many things to ask it is difficult to figure out where to begin, yet numerous simply need the viciousness to stop. Mass shootings generally are just the same old thing new, aside from they appear to happen more regularly in present day society. You can return in history and find out about mass shootings that have occurred before the turn of the century. The possibility of honest individuals being shot and executed for reasons unknown is sufficient for individuals to need to make a move. The issue here is that it appears there are insufficient individuals willing to stand firm against it. There are laws set up to ensure individuals however they get broken so rapidly enough it is hard to discover another arrangement before another shooting happens.

Yet, the issue is that remiss laws time and again make it simple for good citizens to get firearms, as well as for trouble makers to get weapons. The proof is overpowering that general more weapons and more loosened up firearm laws lead to more fierce passing and wounds. According to NYTimes article by Nicholas Kristof 'How to Reduce Shootings', in 1995, Connecticut tightened licensing laws, while in 2007 Missouri eased gun laws. The upshot? In the wake of fixing weapon laws, gun murder rates dropped 40 percent in Connecticut. What's more, after Missouri facilitated firearm laws, weapon crime rates rose 25 percent. There has been advance in attempting to make public area more secure however it is a long way from what things could resemble. Schools and other open spots have issues with subsidizing when endeavoring to expand safety efforts. The media has an issue in this also when they watch out for feature material that can be touchy to a few watchers. Tragically, it is reality that more youthful groups of onlookers are being presented to. Meanwhile, more individuals are concentrating on the most proficient method to remain safe, including what should be possible to avoid different mass shootings.

First, we must repeal the N.R.A.-backed Dickey Amendment, named for the man who sponsored it, former Representative Jay Dickey, an Arkansas Republican. It reads: None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.

With generation that we are in, there are too many tragedies. A passage of new regulations would be a welcome change from our political intransigence and lack of response to our ongoing epidemic of gun violence and mass shootings in this country.

Read full document← View the full, formatted essay now!
Is it not the essay you were looking for?Get a custom essay exampleAny topic, any type available
banner
x
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we'll assume you're on board with our cookie policy. That's Fine