Basically a profit based company or organization can be defined as a business that is run whose the main objective is to earn money or generate profit, it is the contrary to a non profit based company which more concentrating on a goal on helping the community and money is only important so that it remain operating. In other words the money that they spent or invested should be lesser than what they are taking in.
However, innumerable companies agreed and firm that they are obligated to "give back" to society or the community. This prominence involves contributions of time and money, accountable to offer environmentally friendly goods and services, as well as the aspiration to develop and advance the lives of individuals here and throughout the world. Such socially accountable and trustworthy companies perceive to it such a "consciousness" permeates everything they do. Huge companies nowadays affirm that the reason they are in business is not merely to gain profits, but they have the intention on helping some greater social purpose. They proclaim their determinations to generate healthier foods or more fuel-efficient vehicles, preserve energy and further resources in their operations, apart from making the world a better place to live in. Prominent foundations like the Academy of Management and the United Nations are one of the companies that inspire companies to practice such approaches.
The reason why companies had turned towards to other notion that is social responsibilities to serve the larger needs of the community is due to the fascination they had in gaining profit that had cause consequences and difficulties to the company. By concentrating their complete determination on the bottom line, lots companies have lower down their worth to the other constituencies that justly great companies serve, i.e. customers, employees and society. Disadvantages
One of the paramount disadvantages of a profit-making business is that it is required to make payment of taxes on its profits. This is the sole reason why there are plenty of companies are hard-working in attempting to take advantage of every accessible business income tax reductions. Profitable businesses should make hard decisions for example whether the profits should be reinvested in future development and progress or just merely issuing and administer it to shareholders from the dividend settlement and clearance. Moneymaking businesses too have to handle and manage with enhanced 21st
century outlooks and hopes that they would be able to maintain the stability of profits with social as well as environmental responsibility. Cases and Critical Analysis
It shall not be shocking and unexpected that profitable services exist in the child-care landscape. Nonetheless, the past decades arise of â€œbig-boxâ€
child care located in Canada has been received with distress by advocates for whom this is found discordant and mismatched with the justifiable, including, greater attribute and excellence in early childhood system they have long taken into account. Research revealed for-profit childcare usually to be substandard and deficient quality than non-profit. Aside from that, a local experience back in the 1970s, Alabama-based Kinder-Care had organize a crucial lobby campaign intended at decreasing Ontarioâ€™s staff-child ratios and the 1980s experience a unpleasant five-month attack over appallingly low wages at Ontarioâ€™s Mini-Skool chain. Furthermore, conviction held so that parents would have a say regarding their childcare fairly rather permitting it to be led by a head office or shareholder group. The existence idea of that childcare must improve and boost social presence and community solidarity, not distinguish children and families into groups like â€œthe subsidized poorâ€
and â€œthe pay-your-own-wayâ€
well-to-do elite. The primary question that must be asked and given answer to is whether child care should be a public good to benefit all members of the society or a business whose objectives could have been little to do with assisting children, families and community.
Milton Friedman and Thomas Mulligan acknowledge the values of a profit-driven economic system. They had never argued over the essentiality of profits. However, they do disagree over whether or not business or companies have responsibilities beyond gaining profits. Friedman assures that the solitary duty of business is to gain profits. He claims that anybody who upholds otherwise is â€œpreaching pure and unadulterated socialism.â€
Whereas, Mulligan challenges Friedmanâ€™s statement rests on a debatable paradigm, a made-up principle, and a logic that occasionally lacks persuasiveness.
As stated by Mulligan, Friedman is spot-on in indicating that implementing social responsibility cost a lot of usage of money. If nothing else, a company suffers outlay upon providing the man-hours required in contemplating the potential social effects of alternatives acts and appraise the advantage or disadvantage of each set of results. However, Friedman is mistaken in alleged that such cost is necessary to be enforce by one business stakeholder on the rest, outside the entire joint and combined process of tactical and operative business management. He believes overload in implying through his fictional instances that the businessperson whom further the socially responsible course undoubtedly acts exclusive of due devotion to return on investment, budgetary limitations, rational employee remuneration, or reasonable pricing. The aim and objective is to deliver that the thrust is to present that Friedman misinterpret the nature of social responsibility in business and that business people can undergone a socially responsible course without intolerable and unacceptable outcomes requested by Friedman. It would be an additional phase to establish why business people ought to pursue such a course. Being said it is for the responsibility for another occasion. As for now, Mulligan only perceive Friedmanâ€™s personal final proclamation comprises a moral pressure to business people. Business should occupy an â€œopen and free competition without deception and fraud.â€
If Friedman refused to acknowledge that even reserved words rest open a wide array of moral requirement and social responsibility for business, which is after all one of the major areas of individual communication in our society, then the inaccuracy and error belongs to him.
In summary, if companies wage their employees more, they will definitely maintain loyalty, decrease turnover, and obtained well-to-do employees. In a long period of time, this shall lessen the training and employing costs. Apart from that, expanding customer satisfaction shall result to increase revenue. Not only that, remunerating the employees more, companies will also place more money in the hands consumers, who will later turn around and spend it to purchase goods and services from companies. Thus, companies will assist to quicken the progression and development of the economy as a whole. By achieving such, the companies will also develop successfully. In succession, it will help generate more abiding and stable shareholder value.
> accessed 5 August 14 
The Wall Street Journal, â€œThe Case Against Corporation Social Responsibiityâ€ (http://online.wsj.com/)< http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748703338004575230112664504890> accessed 6 August 14 
Henry Blodget, Business Insider, â€œWe Need to Stop Maximizing Profit and Start Maximizing Valueâ€ (http://www.businessinsider.com/)<https://www.businessinsider.com/lets-stop-maximizing-profit-and-start-maximizing-value-2012-12
?IR=T&> accessed 8 August 14 
Neil Kokemuller, â€œ What Are the Advantages & Disadvantages of Profit and Non-profit Organizationsâ€( http://www.ehow.com/) <https://bizfluent.com/info-8560192-advantages-disadvantages-profit-nonprofit-organizations.html
Raffi Anderian, â€œThe Case Against for-profit â€˜big boxâ€™ Child Careâ€ (http://www.thestar.com/)<https://bizfluent.com/info-8560192-advantages-disadvantages-profit-nonprofit-organizations.html> 
Milton friedman, â€œThe Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits,â€ New York Times Magazine (September 13 1970) 
Thomas Mulligan, from â€œA Critique of Milton Friendmanâ€™s Essay â€˜The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits,â€™ â€œ Journal of Business Ethics (1986)